My firm is looking to "score" a set of patents in our portfolio and I'd appreciate any comments on which scoring method is the best. Do patent scores really help identify the best patents?
Thanks in advance
PatExp Date: Sep 18, 2008
Read the claims!
Anonymous Date: Sep 22, 2008
My take has always been to use a "score" to help to separate the stronger patents from the weak, but never use it as an absolute measure
Anonymous Date: Dec 26, 2008
I have always had good luck identifying good patents with a combination of forward cites, backward cites, and looking for broad claims (but not overly broad)
PatExp Date: Dec 26, 2008
Forward cites are a good way to go, but be careful of excessive internal self citations by certain companies. Some companies are known to massively cite their own internal patents when filing, and this definitely can skew raw counts of forward cites.
If you're looking at Patents360 data, be sure to get the counts for internal versus external cites which can help you understand the effect
Anonymous Date: Jan 25, 2009
PatExp wrote:
Read the claims!
The only way to really gauge the quality
Anonymous Date: Jul 23, 2009
CPA Global is the company which can serve you better. They have a sophisticated methodology which is better than others.
you may contact rjindal@cpaglobal.com
Anonymous Date: Jul 29, 2009
Can you elaborate a little on the type of patent scoring that CRA can perform? Is it on the main site?